Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- analyses:vanhouwelingen1993 [2021/11/08 15:09] – Wolfgang Viechtbauer
+++ analyses:vanhouwelingen1993 [2022/08/03 11:22] (current) – Wolfgang Viechtbauer
@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
 </code>
-These results match what is reported on page 2277. In particular, the estimated average log odds ratio is $\hat{\mu} = 0.17$ (with 95% confidence interval: $-0.09$ to $0.44$).((Note that this interval is slightly different than the confidence profile interval reported by the authors on page 2278. The interval obtained here is a Wald-type interval.)) The estimated amount of heterogeneity is $\hat{\tau}^2 = .35^2$. The log likelihood for this model is $ll = -52.99$.
+These results match what is reported on page 2277. In particular, the estimated average log odds ratio is $\hat{\mu} = 0.17$ (with 95% confidence interval: $-0.09$ to $0.44$),((Note that this interval is slightly different than the confidence profile interval reported by the authors on page 2278. The interval obtained here is a Wald-type interval.)) while the estimated amount of heterogeneity is $\hat{\tau}^2 = .35^2$. The log likelihood for this model is $ll = -52.99$.
 ==== Mixture Model ====
@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 </code>
 <code output>
 Computer Assisted Mixture Analysis:
 Data consists of 25 observations (rows).
 The Mixture Analysis identified 2 components of a gaussian distribution:
 DETAILS:
           p         mean
 0.8183766 -0.008554017
 0.1816234  1.036847813
 Log-Likelihood: -28.87813     BIC: 67.41289
 </code>