The metafor Package

A Meta-Analysis Package for R

User Tools

Site Tools

analyses:raudenbush2009

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
analyses:raudenbush2009 [2020/06/26 06:50] – Wolfgang Viechtbaueranalyses:raudenbush2009 [2020/06/26 06:51] – Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Line 89: Line 89:
 Again, these are the same results reported in Table 16.2 (p. 301). In particular, $\hat{\tau}^2 = .019$, $\hat{\mu} = .084$, $SE[\hat{\mu}] = .052$, and $z = 1.62$ for the test $H_0: \mu = 0$. Again, these are the same results reported in Table 16.2 (p. 301). In particular, $\hat{\tau}^2 = .019$, $\hat{\mu} = .084$, $SE[\hat{\mu}] = .052$, and $z = 1.62$ for the test $H_0: \mu = 0$.
  
-==== Credibility/Prediction Interval ====+==== Prediction Interval ====
  
 Raudenbush (2009) also reports the results from a 95% prediction interval (or "plausible value interval"), which can be obtained with $\hat{\mu} \pm 1.96 \hat{\tau}$. Such an interval can be obtained with: Raudenbush (2009) also reports the results from a 95% prediction interval (or "plausible value interval"), which can be obtained with $\hat{\mu} \pm 1.96 \hat{\tau}$. Such an interval can be obtained with:
analyses/raudenbush2009.txt · Last modified: 2022/08/03 17:09 by Wolfgang Viechtbauer