analyses:raudenbush2009
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
analyses:raudenbush2009 [2019/05/15 19:14] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | analyses:raudenbush2009 [2020/06/26 06:51] – Wolfgang Viechtbauer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Again, these are the same results reported in Table 16.2 (p. 301). In particular, $\hat{\tau}^2 = .019$, $\hat{\mu} = .084$, $SE[\hat{\mu}] = .052$, and $z = 1.62$ for the test $H_0: \mu = 0$. | Again, these are the same results reported in Table 16.2 (p. 301). In particular, $\hat{\tau}^2 = .019$, $\hat{\mu} = .084$, $SE[\hat{\mu}] = .052$, and $z = 1.62$ for the test $H_0: \mu = 0$. | ||
- | ==== Credibility/ | + | ==== Prediction Interval ==== |
- | Raudenbush (2009) also reports the results from a 95% credibility/ | + | Raudenbush (2009) also reports the results from a 95% prediction interval (or " |
<code rsplus> | <code rsplus> | ||
predict(res.RE) | predict(res.RE) | ||
</ | </ | ||
<code output> | <code output> | ||
- | pred se ci.lb ci.ub | + | pred se ci.lb ci.ub |
0.089 0.056 -0.020 0.199 -0.245 0.423 | 0.089 0.056 -0.020 0.199 -0.245 0.423 | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | but note that the interval ($-0.245$ to $0.423$) is a bit wider than the one reported in the book chapter (p. 302). That is because the credibility | + | but note that the interval ($-0.245$ to $0.423$) is a bit wider than the one reported in the book chapter (p. 302). That is because the prediction |
==== Measures of Heterogeneity ==== | ==== Measures of Heterogeneity ==== |
analyses/raudenbush2009.txt · Last modified: 2022/08/03 17:09 by Wolfgang Viechtbauer